A New Jersey-based construction management firm has been
charged with bribing Indian officials to win two major water developmental
projects in Goa and Guwahati. The bribe, of $976,630 for a Goa project by Louis
Berger, included that to a minister, the details of which have not been
disclosed by the US Department of Justice.
On Friday, the company agreed to pay a $17.1-million
criminal fine to resolve charges that it bribed officials in India, Indonesia,
Vietnam and Kuwait to secure government construction management contracts. Two
of its former executives, Richard Hirsch (61) of the Philippines and James
McClung (59) of the UAE, pleaded guilty to the charges.
Previously, McClung had served as senior vice-president,
responsible for the firm’s operations in India and Vietnam.
Sentencing hearings for Hirsch and McClung are scheduled for
November 5 this year.
The Indian government, assisted by its Japanese counterpart,
had initiated the five-year Goa water supply and sewerage project to expand,
rehabilitate and build water and sewerage facilities. Louis Berger was part of
a consortium responsible for the project in Goa. The consortium included two
Japanese firms and an Indian partner.
The team developed a project management information system
and plan, evaluated bids, reviewed design and construction plans, and ensured
quality work was done on time and within the budget, the company said on its
website.
In an 11-page charge sheet, US federal prosecutors alleged
Louis Berger maintained a detailed diary and account of bribery to Indian
officials. On August 26, 2010, “a consortium partner prepared a
payment-tracking schedule, stating the company had paid $976,630 in bribes in
connection with the Goa project to date”, federal prosecutors told a court in
New Jersey.
“Along with several consortium partners, the company won two
water development projects in Goa and Guwahati. The company paid bribes to win
both these contracts,” the prosecutors alleged.
On August 17, 2010, a consortium partner sent an e-mail to
James McClung, stating, “As discussed, I enclose the details, as provided by
(the third-party intermediary). I have also added the details of amounts paid
to (the company) as of date by (the consortium partner) in the same sheet.”
The attachment included an entry: “Paid by (an agent of the
company) to the minister on behalf of the agent,” the prosecutors said.
According to court documents, the company, through its
employees and agents, used terms such as “commitment fee”, “counterpart per
diem”, “marketing fee” and “field operations expenses” as codes to conceal the
true nature of the payments and utilised cash disbursement forms and invoices
that didn’t truthfully describe the services provided or the purpose of the
payment.
#newsliveAssam
#Assamnews #Assamnewslive #northeastlatestnews #Assamnewsliveonline #PratidinTime
#AssameseNewsChannel
For more news, visit: http://www.pratidintime.com/
Similar news blogs: http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ http://www.ibnlive.com/blog/
No comments:
Post a Comment